It’s not really a problem with those kind of ‘good tonal spread with open shadows’ photos which I find people often pushing (like when demonstrating the ‘correct’ way to process an image). It also seems to show up more in out of focus areas.
#Iridient developer screen shots software#
But it is also software compounded, as it is worse in jPegs, worse if soft-proofing and worse in Aperture than Lightroom. I’ve never seen this before, so presumably it is an X-Trans thing. It looks like someone has taken some nugget (shoe polish) on a brush and dabbed it along the edges of shadows. I first noticed it before I had bought my X100s, when I downloaded someone’s example X-Pro1 files (so, it’s not just me doing something odd on import). However, I haven’t noticed anyone writing about the horrible smudged effect at the transitional edges of shadows. Lots of stuff on the inter-naught about the pixel peeping results from the X-Trans sensors. But hey, it’s a personal thing, and also, depending on what’s being looked at, it really is splitting hairs at times.ģ. Overall, I find Capture One processed RAW files look best. Maybe Iridient Developer 2.2 gets more detail (important when you’re printing pixels), and maybe others do this or that, but for overall use as a RAW importer / converter / etc., I think Capture One comes out trumps. People rave about the quality of the jPegs from X-Trans cameras. They’re just my ideas & if they differ from other people’s, that is fine. These are all just boldfaced statements about how I feel or what I think.
0 kommentar(er)
